| 1 |
mutt allows the use of dev.gentoo.org on the fly when the |
| 2 |
FROM: address is @gentoo.org? Can "send-hook gentoo\.org" |
| 3 |
be used to define an smtpserver instead of using the local |
| 4 |
default one? |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 08:12:06AM -0500, Kurt Lieber wrote: |
| 7 |
> On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 01:57:12PM +0100 or thereabouts, Patrick Kursawe wrote: |
| 8 |
> > I'm afraid this will force me to use another mail client than my |
| 9 |
> > beloved mutt - or can anyone tell me how to convice it to work with |
| 10 |
> > different SMTP servers since currently (afaik) it just invokes "sendmail" |
| 11 |
> > to get the local MTA? |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> I use mutt as well and you're right, it isn't smtp-aware. In both of our |
| 14 |
> cases, we'd have to configure our MTAs to talk to dev.gentoo.org via asmtp. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> Another option is implementing a CA and handing out gentoo-signed certs to |
| 17 |
> developers. We could then authenticate via certificates instead of |
| 18 |
> passwords. That's quite a bit more complex, but I believe more MTAs |
| 19 |
> support TLS than asmtp. (though I'm hoping to be proven wrong on this |
| 20 |
> point) |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> --kurt |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives