| 1 |
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:12:49 -0400 |
| 2 |
Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> I don't understand how nobody can see that the *TEMPORARY* injunction |
| 4 |
> against packages using this versioning scheme was put into place |
| 5 |
> *BECAUSE* nobody could agree on the solution. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:22 |
| 8 |
Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@×××××××.org> wrote: |
| 9 |
>Mmm, no, what's weird is that you did it about two days after a solution |
| 10 |
was found... |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
How is this conversation even relevant to development anymore? It sounds |
| 13 |
more policy, well questioning authority, and that is clearly meant for |
| 14 |
another ML. |
| 15 |
Can we please move on past the "how did the council decide to make this |
| 16 |
decision" and the "why did the council make this decision?" Try |
| 17 |
gentoo-council@g.o for answers to those questions, after all, anyone |
| 18 |
can be on that ML so it's not like its going to be 'closed door' |
| 19 |
information. |
| 20 |
A more appropriate discussion for here would be "what do we do to start |
| 21 |
working with this decision?" |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Regards, |
| 24 |
Chrissy Fullam |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives