| 1 |
On Tue, 1 May 2007 17:34:07 -0700 |
| 2 |
Brian Harring <ferringb@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
> On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 12:55:05AM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 4 |
> > You're talking implementation details. This isn't the time for that! |
| 5 |
> > No-one has worked out what, if anything, is to be done, so you can't |
| 6 |
> > know how much work whatever it is is. |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> > Having said that, there's no need to figure it out for the whole |
| 9 |
> > tree in one go if it's an EAPI change. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Please stop stating that fallacy; binding it into an EAPI version |
| 12 |
> means you *have* to plan for the whole tree (meaning figure it out up |
| 13 |
> front). |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
It means figuring it out up front, but not changing the whole tree at |
| 16 |
once, which is where the problem is. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Archives