Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Manuel RĂ¼ger" <mrueg@g.o>
To: miknix@g.o
Cc: treecleaner@g.o, gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Removal of gpe-* (Was: [gentoo-dev] stepping out)
Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2015 19:21:15
Message-Id: 54AC359A.5000909@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] stepping out by Angelo Arrifano
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA512
3
4 On 12.10.2014 20:47, Angelo Arrifano wrote:
5 >
6 > packages: --------- * gpe-* We should probably talk about removal
7 > of the gpe category. GPE made sense when Linux in cellphones was
8 > still on its infancy. Nowadays I doubt anymore is using it
9 > anymore.
10
11 What is the current status on this matter? Is gpe-* still in
12 development/use nowadays?
13
14 There are several build failures on gpe-*:
15 https://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=gpe
16
17 Plus
18 repo.eapi.deprecated gpe-base/gpe-icons/gpe-icons-0.25.ebuild: 1
19 repo.eapi.deprecated gpe-base/libgpepimc/libgpepimc-0.9.ebuild: 1
20 which need to be converted otherwise to a more recent EAPI.
21
22 Should I fill a bug requesting the removal of gpe-*?
23
24
25 Cheers,
26
27 Manuel
28 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
29 Version: GnuPG v2.0
30
31 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJUrDWaXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w
32 ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ4MDA1RERERkM0ODM2QkE4MEY3NzY0N0M1
33 OEZCQTM2QzhEOUQ2MzVDAAoJEFj7o2yNnWNcD/wP/2KHCSnnj2eJL7FlNs4dDIQ8
34 61sAlHDMqoZ//evl8wOlxk5aKU/+cgzWNw1NFGhcmY4vs1T/q5B4b1uNONY+zSfl
35 9aiAOWlZlg5+9WTSQ1V+DbgMmAi//LwDHFI1rcYquEXkq/OqXVkAGCyH3clbmDJ9
36 7ZNx94GeT6iXzMOz0D/jg2TmWSry7rFr77kBhZDZ1QJBei5tMuJR6AmVzYgmwFv0
37 F0/uWD3KYGnhEWUdymvX+exJFcAVUfXhcjXHDqTpKnAa8ciYAOI5vAovtq6uhXSj
38 7chyBT6ENlY35oaY2zOwq5ySpkh/ezAw6w/FwOX/xvCiXiNqrvz7obWC4AaJ4Cr7
39 Z/vm7gUQhNjF1eLgcDfHYk6J7aWadkP1Dckiv48+GKMVvliekGgzFOiYf8jMlwMi
40 9ue3MfJOKtcX0hOY7LhgcOLVFelIv2iIaUJO0XmK/XOmRvTb1Pno+OXTNaaOkh3P
41 2Qg6o5EEeLYJXHBaM1TgHnHhtNE2c//3QiJU64zGUtgHsxUSPOSCSg4ik9BtjXAl
42 4no9ml5EjRHVxOVuHUk3WCY+f/8cvLgaMLmcHdWyN/KZGK+uXmBrSfC1r9UtDvEp
43 3+srFwkjlXlpzipnyyhxCruSRTqLo9JTFhbkDcqoyhlkV1kzsgzRTlQSNItfmpRJ
44 NTHS9JvGEfEIE1uOgwcm
45 =zCM9
46 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Replies

Subject Author
Re: Removal of gpe-* (Was: [gentoo-dev] stepping out) Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o>