1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
2 |
Hash: SHA512 |
3 |
|
4 |
On 12.10.2014 20:47, Angelo Arrifano wrote: |
5 |
> |
6 |
> packages: --------- * gpe-* We should probably talk about removal |
7 |
> of the gpe category. GPE made sense when Linux in cellphones was |
8 |
> still on its infancy. Nowadays I doubt anymore is using it |
9 |
> anymore. |
10 |
|
11 |
What is the current status on this matter? Is gpe-* still in |
12 |
development/use nowadays? |
13 |
|
14 |
There are several build failures on gpe-*: |
15 |
https://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=gpe |
16 |
|
17 |
Plus |
18 |
repo.eapi.deprecated gpe-base/gpe-icons/gpe-icons-0.25.ebuild: 1 |
19 |
repo.eapi.deprecated gpe-base/libgpepimc/libgpepimc-0.9.ebuild: 1 |
20 |
which need to be converted otherwise to a more recent EAPI. |
21 |
|
22 |
Should I fill a bug requesting the removal of gpe-*? |
23 |
|
24 |
|
25 |
Cheers, |
26 |
|
27 |
Manuel |
28 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
29 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0 |
30 |
|
31 |
iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJUrDWaXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w |
32 |
ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ4MDA1RERERkM0ODM2QkE4MEY3NzY0N0M1 |
33 |
OEZCQTM2QzhEOUQ2MzVDAAoJEFj7o2yNnWNcD/wP/2KHCSnnj2eJL7FlNs4dDIQ8 |
34 |
61sAlHDMqoZ//evl8wOlxk5aKU/+cgzWNw1NFGhcmY4vs1T/q5B4b1uNONY+zSfl |
35 |
9aiAOWlZlg5+9WTSQ1V+DbgMmAi//LwDHFI1rcYquEXkq/OqXVkAGCyH3clbmDJ9 |
36 |
7ZNx94GeT6iXzMOz0D/jg2TmWSry7rFr77kBhZDZ1QJBei5tMuJR6AmVzYgmwFv0 |
37 |
F0/uWD3KYGnhEWUdymvX+exJFcAVUfXhcjXHDqTpKnAa8ciYAOI5vAovtq6uhXSj |
38 |
7chyBT6ENlY35oaY2zOwq5ySpkh/ezAw6w/FwOX/xvCiXiNqrvz7obWC4AaJ4Cr7 |
39 |
Z/vm7gUQhNjF1eLgcDfHYk6J7aWadkP1Dckiv48+GKMVvliekGgzFOiYf8jMlwMi |
40 |
9ue3MfJOKtcX0hOY7LhgcOLVFelIv2iIaUJO0XmK/XOmRvTb1Pno+OXTNaaOkh3P |
41 |
2Qg6o5EEeLYJXHBaM1TgHnHhtNE2c//3QiJU64zGUtgHsxUSPOSCSg4ik9BtjXAl |
42 |
4no9ml5EjRHVxOVuHUk3WCY+f/8cvLgaMLmcHdWyN/KZGK+uXmBrSfC1r9UtDvEp |
43 |
3+srFwkjlXlpzipnyyhxCruSRTqLo9JTFhbkDcqoyhlkV1kzsgzRTlQSNItfmpRJ |
44 |
NTHS9JvGEfEIE1uOgwcm |
45 |
=zCM9 |
46 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |