Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Policy for late/slow stabilizations
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2010 16:38:49
Message-Id: 20100627173834.230f0f76@snowcone
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Policy for late/slow stabilizations by Markos Chandras
1 On Sun, 27 Jun 2010 18:04:45 +0300
2 Markos Chandras <hwoarang@g.o> wrote:
3 > Whilst I do understand that these arches are understaffed and they
4 > can't keep up with the increased stabilization load like x86/amd64
5 > do, I still think that slow stabilization leads to an obsolete stable
6 > tree which I doesn't make sense to me after all.
8 Which does Gentoo care about more: slightly increased convenience for
9 most developers, or considerably increased inconvenience for users of
10 minority archs?
12 --
13 Ciaran McCreesh


File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature


Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Policy for late/slow stabilizations Markos Chandras <hwoarang@g.o>