1 |
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 05:32:38PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
2 |
> On Wed, 17 May 2006 11:23:19 +0200 Wernfried Haas <amne@g.o> |
3 |
> wrote: |
4 |
> | We really should figure that stuff out before we start integrating an |
5 |
> | externally written package manager we have no influence on whatsoever |
6 |
> |
7 |
> How much influence does your typical Gentoo developer or user have over |
8 |
> the development of Portage? Please consider long-standing feature |
9 |
> requests such as :slot and [use] deps in your answer. |
10 |
|
11 |
Can we *please* avoid the portage bashing for at least a few days? |
12 |
|
13 |
As we've discussed in the past, sane base design and you can do |
14 |
use/slot without too much trouble. Folks *do* request things of |
15 |
portage, and it *does* get added- multilib came about via requests |
16 |
from lv (pretty quick turn around), axxo's need for env tricks to deal |
17 |
with /etc/profile issues* results in pre/post phase hooks being added, |
18 |
etc. |
19 |
|
20 |
Portage devs work with a crap source trying to implement what folks |
21 |
want- the code does fight certain features. That doesn't mean you can |
22 |
construe it as "portage devs don't listen" as you're implying. |
23 |
|
24 |
Besides that, lay off 'em. Lot of people want features out of |
25 |
portage, but nobody ever steps up- usually what comes of it is just |
26 |
someone flaming them, rather then providing a patch. |
27 |
~harring |