| 1 |
Ben de Groot wrote: |
| 2 |
> Hanno Böck wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>> So question, what are the showstoppers for qt 4.4? And more general comment, |
| 5 |
>> especially on important packages that many people rely on, please provide |
| 6 |
>> more informative comments in package mask, e.g. bug numbers. |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Bug numbers should indeed have been provided. The tracker bugs are: |
| 10 |
> #217528 - [Tracker] x11-libs/qt-4.4.0 unmasking |
| 11 |
> #217161 - [Tracker] split Qt 4.4 |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Mostly it's a question of packages not having split qt-4 deps yet. Other |
| 14 |
> than that, the ebuilds have seen enough testing, as they are needed for |
| 15 |
> kde-4.1 for example, so that is not an issue anymore. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
>> For the dependencies, I think this isn't a showstopper either, as if you don't |
| 19 |
>> have split dependencies on qt, it'll just take the metapackage and everything |
| 20 |
>> is like before. |
| 21 |
>> |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> Except that as per bug 217161 nothing should depend on the metapackage. |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> At the moment I'm going through all the remaining open bugs. If things |
| 26 |
> are easy to fix for me I am fixing the deps, otherwise I'm leaving a |
| 27 |
> comment that the package needs fixing ASAP, because I don't want to wait |
| 28 |
> with unmasking qt-4.4 any longer. I hope to be able to do that by |
| 29 |
> tomorrow. (Although I'm still waiting on the remainder of the qt team to |
| 30 |
> officially become a member.) |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
> Regards, |
| 33 |
> Ben |
| 34 |
> |
| 35 |
> |
| 36 |
That being said, anyone wanna give me a hand with MythTV 0.22 depends? |
| 37 |
I'd appreciate it. |
Archives