1 |
Ühel kenal päeval, R, 20.07.2018 kell 17:01, kirjutas Benda Xu: |
2 |
> Hi Mart, |
3 |
> |
4 |
> Mart Raudsepp <leio@g.o> writes: |
5 |
> |
6 |
> > That said, I would question such a choice. Does it technically not |
7 |
> > work or what's the problem with it? |
8 |
> |
9 |
> It works partially. Most of the time they does not bulid. |
10 |
|
11 |
That sounds like a case for package.use.mask for the given packages in |
12 |
prefix profiles? |
13 |
|
14 |
> The host OS handles /dev for Gentoo Prefix, be it mdev or udev. |
15 |
|
16 |
But in various cases it's about getting notified of plugged in devices. |
17 |
But yes, then the question is if the prefix libudev can get these |
18 |
notifications from host udev or some such. |
19 |
|
20 |
> > But it's up the prefix project. |
21 |
> |
22 |
> Yes, if the Linux profile enables it, we will have to disable it |
23 |
> explicitly in the Linux Prefix profiles. |
24 |
> |
25 |
|
26 |
But you are getting this already for various packages from their IUSE |
27 |
defaults +udev usage as far as I can see. |
28 |
|
29 |
|
30 |
Anyhow, I concede to the problems stemming from USE_ORDER described by |
31 |
mjo and retract my strong preference of global USE=udev, pending proper |
32 |
solution for those problems. However concrete examples as asked by Matt |
33 |
would be nice. |
34 |
Someone should work on that USE_ORDER issue... This IUSE default vs |
35 |
profiles trouble keeps coming up every couple of months.. |
36 |
|
37 |
|
38 |
Mart |