| 1 |
maillog: 28/10/2004-17:35:05(-0400): Chris Gianelloni types |
| 2 |
> On Thu, 2004-10-28 at 23:32 +0200, Maurice van der Pot wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Of course. That's not what I meant. I was talking about the X that could |
| 4 |
> > be in KDE and in GNOME. |
| 5 |
> > |
| 6 |
> > I guess then that dependencies (like X, what I indicated with a prefix) |
| 7 |
> > should not be part of the groups we define. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> I think this is the best solution. We don't have to add everything to a |
| 10 |
> group. Just add the stuff that is specific to that group. For example, |
| 11 |
> @GNOME would have gnome gtk gtk2 and arts, but not X. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
I was not following the discussion closely, but why would @GNOME have |
| 14 |
"gtk" and not "X"? What makes "gtk" less/more essential than X? How do |
| 15 |
you decide which flag to leave out of a group, and which one not? |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
> Georgi Georgiev > Lisp Users: Due to the holiday next > |
| 19 |
< chutz@×××.net < Monday, there will be no garbage < |
| 20 |
> +81(90)6266-1163 > collection. > |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives