Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Brian Evans <grknight@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Running repoman on the portage tree
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 02:38:34
Message-Id: 546C02A0.2070300@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Running repoman on the portage tree by Alec Ten Harmsel
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 On 11/18/2014 09:17 PM, Alec Ten Harmsel wrote:
5 > Hey devs,
6 >
7 > This is my first mail to this list. If this is out of line, let me
8 > know.
9 >
10 > I've been playing around with Jenkins (continuous integration
11 > server) recently for a couple of personal projects, including my
12 > own overlay. I thought it would be cool to run 'repoman full' on
13 > the portage tree. A couple of things surprised me:
14 >
15 > * It took over 4 hours * So many (~3MB output) warnings, especially
16 > "upstream parallel compilation bug"... thought autoconf handled
17 > this, but I guess not * 9233 ebuilds that use a deprecated EAPI
18 >
19 > Please don't take this the wrong way; I'm not accusing anyone, and
20 > I still love Gentoo, it was just kind of funny. I've attached the
21 > full log for anyone that's interested.
22 >
23 > Alec
24 >
25 This is nothing new
26
27 http://packages.gentooexperimental.org/repoman-checks/ has continuous
28 output.
29
30 Brian
31 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
32 Version: GnuPG v2
33 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
34
35 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUbAKgAAoJEE4V4vFnx44dRbwH/jJ5jHYeMd74fT858anM+R9e
36 N5S7K50mfaVLQTdCTT2Nq4/0KESBinZeAL53eqPk21K8qXzZFh39KwvTdL6KU/24
37 KB5e3utWbotmpZdF8vkOehHEYZHqo/zXiPIvgM1zdJPVi7f+zJDBbhLW9fjt4f9e
38 MLNcQKpcyVj/8B3p8jt82rz+v6lqMloCyivbvdX271kh/h++wImK6O/vljceQG0I
39 JOVjKHlWd5G4L6hAWiHI2iIsvoqSwEYt0iNZZ3BNx7fErgzzKqitFfPFK0/5mYDU
40 RjAsUNObe0em/SZrOnRfaiPvOEiLKVLibR0xUW3Y68WGGake9CIB3OYdltPZHX8=
41 =BjDk
42 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Running repoman on the portage tree Alec Ten Harmsel <alec@××××××××××××××.com>