1 |
Robin H. Johnson wrote: |
2 |
> On Wed, Oct 01, 2008 at 08:13:14PM +0000, Ben de Groot (yngwin) wrote: |
3 |
>> Index: metadata.xml |
4 |
>> =================================================================== |
5 |
> ... |
6 |
>> + <flag name='webkit'> |
7 |
>> + Enable <pkg>x11-libs/qt-webkit</pkg> support, for more |
8 |
>> + sophisticated online help display using webkit???s HTML renderer. |
9 |
>> + </flag> |
10 |
>> + </use> |
11 |
>> </pkgmetadata> |
12 |
> |
13 |
> I don't think there is any precedence here, but Unicode should not turn |
14 |
> up in the English useflag descriptions, at least not while we are still |
15 |
> generating use.local.desc for users. |
16 |
> |
17 |
> This one was really annoying, U+2019 "Right single quotation mark", |
18 |
> which renders identically to an apostrophe, at least on my fonts. |
19 |
> |
20 |
> It briefly broke the use.local.desc generation, because that had been |
21 |
> set for ASCII. |
22 |
> |
23 |
> Should we allow UTF-8 in the English variant? Are all the programs that |
24 |
> still read use.local.desc UTF-8 safe? Do we have a deprecation schedule |
25 |
> for use.local.desc being removed totally? |
26 |
> |
27 |
The xml header in each metadata.xml states that the content is UTF-8 |
28 |
encoded, and any XML parser has to be able to handle this. Also, when |
29 |
used literally in xml, the 5 special characters & ' " < > cause a |
30 |
well-formedness error, as far as I know. U+2019 is the recommended form |
31 |
of using the apostrophe. So in my opinion, if we want to use xml, we |
32 |
should use unicode properly. |
33 |
|
34 |
Cheers, |
35 |
|
36 |
-- |
37 |
Ben de Groot |
38 |
Gentoo Linux developer (lxde, media, desktop-misc) |
39 |
Gentoo Linux Release Engineering PR liaison |
40 |
__________________________________________________ |
41 |
|
42 |
yngwin@g.o |
43 |
http://ben.liveforge.org/ |
44 |
irc://chat.freenode.net/#gentoo-media |
45 |
irc://irc.oftc.net/#lxde |
46 |
__________________________________________________ |