From: | Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | Matthew Marchese <maffblaster@g.o> | ||
Cc: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 0/1] Add 'notes' element to metadata.xml (GLEP 68) | ||
Date: | Thu, 07 Oct 2021 07:28:03 | ||
Message-Id: | u4k9te1l6@gentoo.org | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 0/1] Add 'notes' element to metadata.xml (GLEP 68) by Matthew Marchese |
1 | >>>>> On Thu, 07 Oct 2021, Matthew Marchese wrote: |
2 | |
3 | > I also like the idea of markdown files or RST files living in |
4 | > gentoo::. I personally find RST to be a bit more challenging to write, |
5 | > but it's simple enough to learn and we 'already have RST to HTML |
6 | > conversion on www.g.o for GLEPs. GitHub will render either file format |
7 | > in browser. Not sure about all the other Git* sites. |
8 | |
9 | > Apparently the MD and RST formats are somewhat interchangeable if one |
10 | > does not go too crazy on formatting: |
11 | > https://gist.github.com/javiertejero/4585196 |
12 | |
13 | To add to this, here are two excellent articles comparing the two |
14 | formats: |
15 | |
16 | https://www.zverovich.net/2016/06/16/rst-vs-markdown.html |
17 | https://eli.thegreenplace.net/2017/restructuredtext-vs-markdown-for-technical-d$ |
18 | |
19 | Given that we already use RST elsewhere and that it is well supported by |
20 | docutils (and our own docutils-glep), that's the format I'd personally |
21 | prefer. |
22 | |
23 | Otherwise, the picture in the first article pretty much summarizes it. |
24 | :) |
25 | |
26 | Ulrich |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |