| 1 |
On 12-03-2010 08:46:34 -0700, Denis Dupeyron wrote: |
| 2 |
> That said they were perfectly entitled to make the decision of not |
| 3 |
> wanting to maintain qt3 any longer. The only advice I can give is that |
| 4 |
> all disgruntled users and developers create a qt3 project and |
| 5 |
> adopt/unmask/re-commit the qt3 libraries for maintainers of packages |
| 6 |
> who need it. I doubt this will happen as this could have been done a |
| 7 |
> long time ago, but it's never too late. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Didn't we have a graveyard thing/overlay somewhere some day? Some users |
| 10 |
might happily prefer to use stuff that's treecleaned, or removed due |
| 11 |
security issues. If removal of stuff would mean it's dumped in there it |
| 12 |
can be easily used by users and more easily readded later afterwards, if |
| 13 |
need arises. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
Fabian Groffen |
| 18 |
Gentoo on a different level |
Archives