From: | Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o> |
---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o |
Subject: | [gentoo-dev] About upstreams appending additional CFLAGS when building with some configure options |
Date: | Wed, 31 Aug 2011 19:25:06 |
Message-Id: | 1314818665.6632.3.camel@belkin4 |
1 | I won't be able to reply to this thread for now, but would like to ask |
2 | about how to handle cases like: |
3 | https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=381355 |
4 | |
5 | Until now, I usually opted to trust upstreams and don't touch FLAGS they |
6 | set (except cases like Werror and so.), but I am not sure if maybe I |
7 | should drop that CFLAGS :-/ |
8 | |
9 | What do you think? Please also take care I doubt upstream wouldn't ever |
10 | accept that change and, then, we should carry it forever. |
11 | |
12 | Thanks a lot for your help |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] About upstreams appending additional CFLAGS when building with some configure options | "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] About upstreams appending additional CFLAGS when building with some configure options | "Aaron W. Swenson" <titanofold@g.o> |