| 1 |
On Mon, 2021-01-04 at 17:50 +0100, Thomas Deutschmann wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 2021-01-04 17:38, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 3 |
> > You've actually added 'portage' to group 'thomas'. |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> Yes, I know that. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Well, I understand why this might be confusing for you. Like I was using |
| 8 |
> portage as example for the described example when you give another |
| 9 |
> service access to a socket like shown in my memcached/redis example. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
This is confusing to me (as is probably to everybody else) because your |
| 14 |
text is saying the exact opposite. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
| Add your user to portage's group [...] |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
You're doing the exact opposite. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Maybe it's time to admit that you've made a mistake, and you've made |
| 21 |
the same mistake the second time in a row, and although it was proven |
| 22 |
wrong before you still keep trying to support your arguments with this |
| 23 |
mistake. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
Best regards, |
| 27 |
Michał Górny |
Archives