Archives
Archives
| From: | Stroller <root@××××××××××××××××××.uk> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Speaking of new kernels being added to the tree | ||
| Date: | Sat, 04 Oct 2003 04:13:19 | ||
| Message-Id: | 5CB4A224-F620-11D7-B976-000A95795F3E@stellar.eclipse.co.uk | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Speaking of new kernels being added to the tree by Donnie Berkholz |
||
| 1 | On 4 Oct 2003, at 3:08 am, Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | >> Could someone please clarify what I'm failing to understand..? |
| 4 | >> Are wolk-, redhat-, secure-, mm- & ck-sources not distributed as |
| 5 | >> complete tarballs..? |
| 6 | > |
| 7 | > In many cases, it's a vanilla kernel and a prepackaged patchset. |
| 8 | |
| 9 | Right. So those should (theoretically) require zero maintenance from |
| 10 | Gentoo -devs, then..? Apart from an eBuild wrapper. |
| 11 | |
| 12 | Stroller. |
| 13 | |
| 14 | |
| 15 | -- |
| 16 | gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |