Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Brian Harring <ferringb@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] sys-libs/ncurses: punted from system in profiles
Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2011 21:54:14
Message-Id: 20111206215255.GB18351@localhost.google.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] sys-libs/ncurses: punted from system in profiles by Mike Frysinger
1 On Tue, Dec 06, 2011 at 03:52:07PM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
2 > On Tuesday 06 December 2011 14:28:02 Zac Medico wrote:
3 > > On 12/06/2011 10:04 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
4 > > > what might be interesting is if we had a "Gentoo default" set which is
5 > > > what would come in a stage3 rather than the current "stage3 is the
6 > > > system set". then we could move virtual/ssh out of the system set and
7 > > > into the "Gentoo default" set so it'd be easier for people to
8 > > > drop/etc... but i'm not familiar enough with the portage support atm to
9 > > > say how feasible such an idea would be.
10 > >
11 > > Similar to how we use packages.build to define the stage1 set, we could
12 > > add a packages.default to define the stage3 set. Alternatively, we could
13 > > use a meta-package to pull in the defaults, and adjust the stage3 build
14 > > to pull in that meta-package automatically.
15 >
16 > the packages.default sounds like a good idea as then we'd be able to
17 > tweak/stack it on a per-profile basis like existing files. i'll file a release
18 > bug on the topic, and then we can talk about moving virtual/ssh out of system
19 > and into that.
20
21 We really need something generic here rather than just introducing new
22 files; this basically duplicates sets for example.
23 ~harring

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] sys-libs/ncurses: punted from system in profiles Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>