Archives
Archives
| From: | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] RFD: EAPI specification in ebuilds | ||
| Date: | Wed, 07 Mar 2012 20:46:30 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20120307204428.3118997e@googlemail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] RFD: EAPI specification in ebuilds by Ulrich Mueller |
||
| 1 | On Wed, 7 Mar 2012 21:41:02 +0100 |
| 2 | Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 | > (I really hope for a constructive discussion here. So, if you want |
| 4 | > to comment that all of the above proposals suck and GLEP 55 is much |
| 5 | > superior, then please open a new thread for it.) |
| 6 | |
| 7 | I think if you want a constructive discussion, then you should ignore |
| 8 | the previous Council's decision and reconsider all the solutions that |
| 9 | have been presented. |
| 10 | |
| 11 | -- |
| 12 | Ciaran McCreesh |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |