Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Mike Gilbert <floppym@g.o>
To: hasufell <hasufell@g.o>, Gentoo Dev <gentoo-dev@l.g.o>
Cc: jlec@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-python/watchdog: watchdog-0.8.3.ebuild ChangeLog
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 04:11:01
Message-Id: CAJ0EP41aYgbROQkpo+HRipPsNFDTaF8=C+9AzFSMmL0ufwm3PQ@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-python/watchdog: watchdog-0.8.3.ebuild ChangeLog by Patrick Lauer
1 On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 7:08 PM, Patrick Lauer <patrick@g.o> wrote:
2 > On Wednesday 18 February 2015 18:43:59 hasufell wrote:
3 >> Is there a communication problem?
4 >>
5 >> I don't remember getting either:
6 >> * a bug report
7 >> * a ping
8 >> * a review request
9 >>
10 >> Did I miss something?
11 >
12 > Yes.
13 >
14 > Why is this package metadata missing the python herd for no reason?
15 >
16
17 Speaking as the current python lead, we don't claim "ownership" of
18 everything in dev-python.
19
20 As a Gentoo developer, I find it silly to raise a stink on a mailing
21 list over what appears to be a very simple version bump of a very
22 simple ebuild. This is not going to convince anyone that a peer review
23 workflow is a desirable thing; I don't want to have someone rubber
24 stamp every trivial version bump.

Replies