From: | Mike Gilbert <floppym@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | hasufell <hasufell@g.o>, Gentoo Dev <gentoo-dev@l.g.o> | ||
Cc: | jlec@g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-python/watchdog: watchdog-0.8.3.ebuild ChangeLog | ||
Date: | Thu, 19 Feb 2015 04:11:01 | ||
Message-Id: | CAJ0EP41aYgbROQkpo+HRipPsNFDTaF8=C+9AzFSMmL0ufwm3PQ@mail.gmail.com | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-python/watchdog: watchdog-0.8.3.ebuild ChangeLog by Patrick Lauer |
1 | On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 7:08 PM, Patrick Lauer <patrick@g.o> wrote: |
2 | > On Wednesday 18 February 2015 18:43:59 hasufell wrote: |
3 | >> Is there a communication problem? |
4 | >> |
5 | >> I don't remember getting either: |
6 | >> * a bug report |
7 | >> * a ping |
8 | >> * a review request |
9 | >> |
10 | >> Did I miss something? |
11 | > |
12 | > Yes. |
13 | > |
14 | > Why is this package metadata missing the python herd for no reason? |
15 | > |
16 | |
17 | Speaking as the current python lead, we don't claim "ownership" of |
18 | everything in dev-python. |
19 | |
20 | As a Gentoo developer, I find it silly to raise a stink on a mailing |
21 | list over what appears to be a very simple version bump of a very |
22 | simple ebuild. This is not going to convince anyone that a peer review |
23 | workflow is a desirable thing; I don't want to have someone rubber |
24 | stamp every trivial version bump. |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-python/watchdog: watchdog-0.8.3.ebuild ChangeLog | Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-python/watchdog: watchdog-0.8.3.ebuild ChangeLog | Markos Chandras <hwoarang@g.o> |