| 1 |
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 10:45:14PM +0200, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 4/10/12 7:54 PM, William Hubbs wrote: |
| 3 |
> > I have updated pybugz-9999 to work with the xmlrpc interface of |
| 4 |
> > bugzilla. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> Cool, thank you for working on that. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> > I can name a couple of issues that are api limitations that we can't do |
| 9 |
> > anything about: |
| 10 |
> > |
| 11 |
> > - you can't search on cc: or keywords fields. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> That's going to be a problem for arch testing needs (e.g. STABLEREQ |
| 14 |
> keyword and x86@ cc-ed). How about doing the searches "the old way" that |
| 15 |
> allowed the above. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
That is not so easy to do since we have completely gotten rid of the old |
| 18 |
method of communicating with bugzilla. That method was not reliable and |
| 19 |
had broken several times with bugzilla upgrades, but using the web |
| 20 |
services will be more stable. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Here is the documentation for their search command [1]. It would |
| 23 |
probably be better for us to open a bug against bugzilla itself and |
| 24 |
request those changes be put in the api. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
What are your thoughts? |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
William |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
[1] http://www.bugzilla.org/docs/4.2/en/html/api/Bugzilla/WebService/Bug.html#search |
Archives