Archives
Archives
| From: | Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Shall econf append its arguments to end of ./configure invocation? | ||
| Date: | Mon, 29 Apr 2013 18:36:47 | ||
| Message-Id: | 201304291436.42577.vapier@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Shall econf append its arguments to end of ./configure invocation? by "Michał Górny" |
||
| 1 | On Monday 29 April 2013 01:55:49 Michał Górny wrote: |
| 2 | > Now, what are your thoughts? Shall we fix PMS to explicitly state |
| 3 | > the argument order or implement ugly hacks in ebuilds? |
| 4 | |
| 5 | portage has always inserted implicit args before the args given by the ebuild |
| 6 | to econf. PMS omitting the ordering information is simply an oversight to be |
| 7 | clarified, not functionality that may be relied upon. |
| 8 | -mike |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Shall econf append its arguments to end of ./configure invocation? | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> |