| 1 |
On Wednesday 08 February 2006 19:24, Jason Stubbs wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Thursday 09 February 2006 08:19, Mark Loeser wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Anyone that is maintaining a binary package in the tree, and requires |
| 4 |
> > libstdc++-v3, please put a rdepend in your package on |
| 5 |
> > =virtual/libstdc++-3.3. I'd like to drop the dependency from gcc-3.4 and |
| 6 |
> > higher so that we do not needlessly force the libstdc++ package on people |
| 7 |
> > that do not need it. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> It was my understanding that it is needed for the 3.3 -> 3.4 upgrade. |
| 10 |
> Various packages that will build fine against either are broken until |
| 11 |
> being recompiled after the upgrade and there is currently no way to |
| 12 |
> express this with dependencies. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
gcc-3.3 wont be removed automatically, so the system wont break until the user |
| 15 |
tells it so :) |
| 16 |
-mike |
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives