| 1 |
On 03/01/12 12:45 PM, Duncan wrote: |
| 2 |
> Ian Stakenvicius posted on Tue, 03 Jan 2012 10:53:45 -0500 as excerpted: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>> Has the LFH been updated?? Googling seems to say no, as the last mod |
| 5 |
>> seems to have been in 2004... |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> That was covered here in the last discussion. The FHS and LSB are |
| 8 |
> getting updated too, with the people driving the update being the very |
| 9 |
> same people, the fedora/redhat folks behind udev/udisks/upower/dbus/ |
| 10 |
> systemd/etc, with gnome as well now talking about a "gnomeos" that |
| 11 |
> integrates and requires the whole set, plus X (or whatever the X |
| 12 |
> successor is called, I forgot ATM) and gnome, of course, so that future |
| 13 |
> gnome will assume systemd, etc, as well. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
FHS, thank you. I didn't think I had that acronym right... |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
OK, well, if this is becoming the official standard then we will |
| 20 |
definitely need to adhere to it; I guess it's just a matter of when and |
| 21 |
what contingency/update plans we want to use to do it.. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
... if Gentoo's installed on a system (regardless of platform, and |
| 24 |
leaving out the Prefix installs), the filesystem is up to gentoo right? |
| 25 |
ie, there wouldn't be a need for a particular platform to stick with |
| 26 |
FHS-2.3 would there? Once we migrate to FHS-3.0, we can migrate all |
| 27 |
archs and profiles at the same time? |
Archives