Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Jakub Moc <jakub@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo 2006.1
Date: Sat, 02 Sep 2006 11:09:10
Message-Id: 44F96559.6010003@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo 2006.1 by Edgar Hucek
1 Edgar Hucek wrote:
2 > Apeal on extended testing :
3 >
4 > Developer, please test things more carefull before you
5 > release it.
6 > I already found things which does not compile out of
7 > the box.
8 > 1.) Use wacom does not compile out of the box. You
9 > have to unmask linuxwacom.
10
11 Shrug. Noone even filed a stabilization bug, ask x11-drivers folks why.
12 There's one now: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145891
13
14 > 2.) Enable the use flage accessibility gnome cant be
15 > merged. It fails on compile the speech-tools.
16 > It seams that USE flags are not realy tested or how
17 > can it happen that there are already know bugs in the
18 > stable distro ?
19 >
20 > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=116030
21 >
22 > Festival and the speech-tools are well know not to
23 > compile with gcc >=4.
24
25
26 Well, you know - if you go to read the speech-tools/festival & co. bug,
27 and read the ebuild, you'll see that the whole thing and code is one
28 huge mess, that doesn't compile even w/ gcc-3.3 without patching. You'd
29 probably prefer to never put out a new release, I guess? How many people
30 are using this one, and how does it justify delaying the release even more?
31
32
33 --
34 Best regards,
35
36 Jakub Moc
37 mailto:jakub@g.o
38 GPG signature:
39 http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E
40 Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E
41
42 ... still no signature ;)

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo 2006.1 Edgar Hucek <gimli@g.o>