Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Cc: Nirbheek Chauhan <nirbheek@g.o>, pr@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: .la files removal news item (GLEP 42)
Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2010 21:32:36
Message-Id: 4CA65351.6010803@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: .la files removal news item (GLEP 42) by Nirbheek Chauhan
1 On 10/01/2010 02:10 PM, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
2 > On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 1:08 AM, Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o> wrote:
3 >> On 10/01/2010 12:12 PM, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
4 >>> Right, so a few weeks later when they re-merge a binpkg, they suddenly
5 >>> get build failures again. And that confuses them since it's
6 >>> unexpected. This is in general a bad experience for stable users who
7 >>> want to get work done, not baby-sit their system.
8 >>
9 >> Maybe advise them to use post_pkg_preinst instead of post_src_install,
10 >> so it works even for binary packages.
11 >>
12 >
13 > If that won't cause problems with portage-2.1.9 (mtime/checksum
14 > messiness, for example; you're the best judge for this), then we
15 > should do it.
16
17 It won't cause problems because the mtime/checksum stuff is all done
18 after preinst, immediately as the files are being merged.
19 --
20 Thanks,
21 Zac