| 1 |
On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 09:19:38AM +0300, Alin Nastac wrote: |
| 2 |
> Henrik Brix Andersen wrote: |
| 3 |
> >Why did you p.mask openobex-apps before openobex-1.2 is stable? |
| 4 |
> > |
| 5 |
> For forcing users to test openobex-1.2 ;) |
| 6 |
> I think openobex-1.2 should be unmasked, but I am waiting for ticho to |
| 7 |
> actually do this. |
| 8 |
> See bug 122262 <http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=122262> |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
You can not package.mask a stable package in favor of a |
| 11 |
package.masked, unstable package unless there are severe security |
| 12 |
issues. That's not how it works. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Please solve this mess - don't package.mask openobex-apps until |
| 15 |
openobex-1.2 has the same KEYWORDS as openobex. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
./Brix |
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
Henrik Brix Andersen <brix@g.o> |
| 20 |
Gentoo Metadistribution | Mobile computing herd |
Archives