1 |
Am Samstag, den 03.04.2010, 02:37 -0700 schrieb Brian Harring: |
2 |
> On Sat, Apr 03, 2010 at 11:16:32AM +0200, Tobias Scherbaum wrote: |
3 |
> > Hell no, but ... |
4 |
> |
5 |
> Then avoid feeding the distrowatch trolls w/ sensational |
6 |
> subjects please ;) |
7 |
|
8 |
oh, well ;) |
9 |
|
10 |
> > We have lots of quite understaffed areas, to sum up in a positive way. |
11 |
> > Summing it up the negative way one might say, we have lots of areas were |
12 |
> > users might get the idea Gentoo already is dead. |
13 |
> |
14 |
> Got any metrics offhand? The reason I ask is that I can't think of a |
15 |
> time when 'understaffed' wasn't an applicable term. |
16 |
|
17 |
Metrics are a problem and i'm pretty sure you won't get any somewhat |
18 |
"correct" metrics as we have lots of herds which do have some developers |
19 |
listed as herd members, who are mia for quite some time. Still when |
20 |
considering herd members who did a commit to a package belonging to |
21 |
given herd in the past say 4 weeks as active you won't get useful |
22 |
metrics. |
23 |
|
24 |
> Sidenote, if we *aren't* tracking the basics, it might be worthwhile. |
25 |
> Shouldn't be too hard to grab the history of herds.xml for example and |
26 |
> extract the relevant data. |
27 |
> |
28 |
> One thing to note... crappy support for something can draw people out |
29 |
> to contribute. Hence asking about metrics- I wouldn't be surprised if |
30 |
> the headcount for misc. projects is a cyclic rise/fall. |
31 |
> |
32 |
> At the very least I'd be curious about the pre and post git metrics, |
33 |
> once that conversion is finished up. |
34 |
> |
35 |
> |
36 |
> > - Infra: One might get the idea our Infra team is just Robin (yeah, sure |
37 |
> > there are more people, but ....) ... things are happening slowly (no |
38 |
> > offend - I fully understand that those few can't dedicate more of their |
39 |
> > spare time to infra work!), take overlays.g.o migration, Bugzie-3 |
40 |
> > migration and so on as an example. |
41 |
> |
42 |
> Relaying from IRC, overlays.g.o migration bits seem to be done... |
43 |
|
44 |
Yeah, probably i had something wrong in mind. Nevermind. |
45 |
|
46 |
Tbh, my intention wasn't to discuss the _examples_ i listed, but to hear |
47 |
all your opinions and ideas on where we do have problems and how to |
48 |
solve them. |
49 |
|
50 |
> > - Website redesign - we had a contest some years ago, got a winner, |
51 |
> > someone started to adapt the design and somewhat that project fall |
52 |
> > asleep. |
53 |
> |
54 |
> A status update on this one would be useful, even if it's just "got no |
55 |
> time, here's what is remaining" so someone could jump in and help |
56 |
> where possible. |
57 |
> |
58 |
> Personally I'd suggest trying to extract status updates from folk- |
59 |
> it's more useful anyways to know what's needed to get various projects |
60 |
> done. |
61 |
|
62 |
Yeah, status updates++ ... at least active projects/herds (like what |
63 |
Robin said about Infra) would be considered more active then :) |
64 |
|
65 |
- Tobias |
66 |
|
67 |
-- |
68 |
Praxisbuch Nagios |
69 |
http://www.oreilly.de/catalog/pbnagiosger/ |
70 |
|
71 |
https://www.xing.com/profile/Tobias_Scherbaum |