| 1 |
Are any jre/jdk's being built with gcc 3.2 yet? Particularly the moz |
| 2 |
plugin. |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
BillK |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
On Sun, 2002-10-20 at 07:42, Karl Trygve Kalleberg wrote: |
| 8 |
> On Sat, 19 Oct 2002 10:13:07 -0500 |
| 9 |
> "Thomas T. Veldhouse" <veldy@×××××.net> wrote: |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> > I agree. Since Gentoo does not fix bugs in the JDK, there is very |
| 12 |
> > little reason not to include it. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> The ticket #8291 "Ebuild for sun-jdk-1.4.1" has been assigned to mkennedy; |
| 15 |
> he'll most likely solve this when more critical issues have been attended |
| 16 |
> to. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> The reason why the sun-jdk-1.4.1 hasn't been included is simply because |
| 19 |
> nobody has gotten around to it yet. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> It should however be some consolation to the Java geeks around that the |
| 22 |
> blackdown-jdk-1.4.1_beta is available for testing on the x86 platform. Go |
| 23 |
> play with it and report back bugs and help the Blackdown team as much as |
| 24 |
> you can. |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> We default to Blackdown whenever possible, as it can be downloaded freely |
| 27 |
> off the net, and mirrored too, unlike the Sun binaries. |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
> Kind regards, |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
> Karl T |
| 33 |
> _______________________________________________ |
| 34 |
> gentoo-user mailing list |
| 35 |
> gentoo-user@g.o |
| 36 |
> http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-user |
| 37 |
> |
Archives