| 1 |
Vapier wrote: [Wed Oct 25 2006, 02:56:28AM CDT] |
| 2 |
> On Wednesday 25 October 2006 03:27, Stuart Herbert wrote: |
| 3 |
> > (As a second principle, if GLEP 39 is amended, wouldn't it be better |
| 4 |
> > to publish a new GLEP to superceed it, rather than revise the existing |
| 5 |
> > GLEP?) |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> i think in general it depends on the nature of the change and how |
| 8 |
> drastic it is of the original ... but that can be a bit of a slippery |
| 9 |
> slope i guess (how do you measure the degree of a change ?) |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Nonetheless, I agree w/ vapier. GLEP 39 supercedes GLEP 4, and clearly |
| 12 |
the changes were extreme there. For the previous and current changes to |
| 13 |
GLEP 39 the changes are much smaller, and I'd rather see the changes |
| 14 |
done inline. *Shrug* It's a slippery slope, but I'd rather rely on |
| 15 |
common sense until there's actual evidence that it's failing. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
-g2boojum- |
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
Grant Goodyear |
| 20 |
Gentoo Developer |
| 21 |
g2boojum@g.o |
| 22 |
http://www.gentoo.org/~g2boojum |
| 23 |
GPG Fingerprint: D706 9802 1663 DEF5 81B0 9573 A6DC 7152 E0F6 5B76 |
Archives