Archives
Archives
| From: | Michael Orlitzky <mjo@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Rationalizing USE flags by narrowing the scope of them. | ||
| Date: | Tue, 04 Jan 2022 00:29:50 | ||
| Message-Id: | 86f58014dd60ba71d5f5bae1e92d51fc1eb501d1.camel@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Rationalizing USE flags by narrowing the scope of them. by Piotr Karbowski |
||
| 1 | On Mon, 2022-01-03 at 21:29 +0100, Piotr Karbowski wrote: |
| 2 | > |
| 3 | > Perhaps the 'pam' example was extreme, but ipv6, or threads as Sam |
| 4 | > shared, does not make sense to be togglable. |
| 5 | > |
| 6 | |
| 7 | Many packages need their ipv6 code disabled if the kernel has no ipv6 |
| 8 | support, and enabling ipv6 in the kernel is a pointless security risk |
| 9 | for pretty much anyone in the United States. |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Rationalizing USE flags by narrowing the scope of them. | Alec Warner <antarus@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Rationalizing USE flags by narrowing the scope of them. | Sam James <sam@g.o> |