From: | William Hubbs <williamh@g.o> |
---|---|
To: | gentoo development <gentoo-dev@l.g.o> |
Subject: | [gentoo-dev] rfc: noarch keyword |
Date: | Wed, 18 Mar 2020 14:54:49 |
Message-Id: | 20200318145442.GA28446@linux1.home |
1 | All, |
2 | |
3 | this came up again on the recent thread about dropping non x86/amd64 |
4 | support for python packages, and I want to bring it up again on its own |
5 | thread. |
6 | |
7 | How often do architecture specific bugs really exist in languages like |
8 | perl, python etc? From what I've seen they are pretty rare. Not to mention, |
9 | if we found one somewhere, we could adjust keywords as necessary. |
10 | |
11 | Also, if someone did inadvertently keyword a package with noarch that didn't |
12 | work everywhere, it would be a matter of adjusting the keywords for that |
13 | package. |
14 | |
15 | So, my question is, why can't we add a noarch/~noarch keyword and see |
16 | how things go? If it gets abused we can always nuke it later. |
17 | |
18 | Thanks, |
19 | |
20 | William |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: noarch keyword | Jaco Kroon <jaco@××××××.za> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: noarch keyword | Rolf Eike Beer <eike@×××××××.de> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: noarch keyword | "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: noarch keyword | "Andreas K. Huettel" <dilfridge@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: noarch keyword | Thomas Deutschmann <whissi@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: noarch keyword | Kent Fredric <kentnl@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: noarch keyword | Michael Orlitzky <mjo@g.o> |