Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Thomas Weidner <3.14159@×××.net>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Wrote a FHS konformant Qt ebuild, opinions?
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 23:34:21
Message-Id: cja81l$gpc$1@sea.gmane.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Wrote a FHS konformant Qt ebuild, opinions? by John Richard Moser
1 John Richard Moser wrote:
2 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
3 > Hash: SHA1
4 >
5 >
6 >
7 > Paul de Vrieze wrote:
8 > | On Monday 27 September 2004 01:19, Thomas Weidner wrote:
9 > |
10 > |>As test i compiled kdelibs-3.3.0 with my Qt ebuild installed.
11 > |>./configure finds Qt without any extra argument, but the kde ebuilds
12 > |>(or eclasses) surely would need to be updated.
13 > |>
14 > |>I'm no experienced ebuild author, but i was very displeased with the
15 > |>current situation, please post your comments and ideas.
16 > |
17 > |
18 > | I'm not longer in the kde team, but I don't give much chance to qt being
19 > | offered this way. There is a reason that qt is the way it is. If you
20 > | wrote the ebuild for your own use it is ok, but the implementation is not
21 > | the problem here, it is the policy.
22 > |
23 >
24 > ~From the POV of someone who has no chance nor will to ever be a Gentoo
25 > dev:
26 >
27 > If it works, demonstrate it to upstream (TrollTech). If it breaks
28 > things it'll probably never go into Gentoo or Qt mainline; though
29 > compatibility work (symlinks all over the damn place) could provide a
30 > migration environment.
31 >
32
33 Qt3 tries to fit into a FHS environment. it's installing several version
34 of Qt in parallell (like Qt2 and Qt3) what makes things hard, and forced
35 gentoo into /usr/qt/${VERSION} (until now? ;-) )
36
37
38 --
39 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list