Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From:	Henrik Brix Andersen <brix@g.o>
To:	gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject:	Re: [gentoo-dev] Changes to date format of current GLEPs (was: GLEP 42 (Critical News Reporting) round five)
Date:	Tue, 13 Dec 2005 23:17:42
Message-Id:	`20051213231357.GC18062@dmz.brixandersen.dk`
In Reply to:	Re: [gentoo-dev] Changes to date format of current GLEPs (was: GLEP 42 (Critical News Reporting) round five) by Olivier Crete

1	On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 06:05:03PM -0500, Olivier Crete wrote:
2	> And why not just adding a changelog to the glep explaining the changes?
3	> I really don't like to idea of having to read 8 gleps to find out how to
4	> write a glep ... and calling it glep 1.a is a good idea.. or 1.1
5
6	GLEP 45, "GLEP date format", says that GLEP 1 should be modified to
7	reflect this new date format, should it be accepted.
8
9	Regards,
10	Brix
11	--
12	Henrik Brix Andersen <brix@g.o>
13	Gentoo Metadistribution \| Mobile computing herd