| 1 |
On Thu, 2015-12-03 at 23:32 +0000, James Le Cuirot wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Thu, 3 Dec 2015 08:22:01 +0000 |
| 3 |
> Joakim Tjernlund <Joakim.Tjernlund@××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> > > There's also a further complication here that I forgot to mention to |
| 6 |
> > > mgorny. While calling configure with --with-sysroot certainly helps, |
| 7 |
> > > it still stumbles on a significant number of packages that do |
| 8 |
> > > relinking at the end of the build if elibtoolize hasn't been called. |
| 9 |
> > > elibtoolize has long patched ltmain.sh with |
| 10 |
> > > ELT-patches/cross/link-ROOT |
| 11 |
> > |
| 12 |
> > I looked at ELT-patches/cross/link-ROOT and it has |
| 13 |
> > --- libltdl/config/ltmain.sh 2008-09-07 19:56:33.000000000 |
| 14 |
> > +0200 +++ libltdl/config/ltmain.sh.new 2009-02-15 |
| 15 |
> > 20:37:47.000000000 +0100 @@ -5768,7 +5768,7 @@ |
| 16 |
> > test "$hardcode_direct_absolute" = no; then |
| 17 |
> > add="$libdir/$linklib" |
| 18 |
> > elif test "$hardcode_minus_L" = yes; then |
| 19 |
> > - add_dir="-L$libdir" |
| 20 |
> > + add_dir="-L$ROOT/$libdir" |
| 21 |
> > add="-l$name" |
| 22 |
> > elif test "$hardcode_shlibpath_var" = yes; then |
| 23 |
> > case :$finalize_shlibpath: in |
| 24 |
> > @@ -5785,7 +5785,7 @@ |
| 25 |
> > fi |
| 26 |
> > else |
| 27 |
> > # We cannot seem to hardcode it, guess we'll fake it. |
| 28 |
> > - add_dir="-L$libdir" |
| 29 |
> > + add_dir="-L$ROOT/$libdir" |
| 30 |
> > |
| 31 |
> > I think this should be "add_dir=-L$lt_sysroot$libdir" rather than |
| 32 |
> > ROOT. See also bug https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=521184 |
| 33 |
> > and since I think this is also a libool bug there is a post upstream |
| 34 |
> > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool/2015-10/msg00012.html |
| 35 |
> > This has not gotten any attention from upstream libtool folks. Would |
| 36 |
> > be great if someone more could push for such a change. |
| 37 |
> |
| 38 |
> Agreed. I already wondered if there was an autotools variable that |
| 39 |
> would be more appreciate. Since aballier also said that this should be |
| 40 |
> corrected, I'll see about doing that in conjunction with these changes. |
| 41 |
> |
| 42 |
> I wouldn't hold your breath for upstream. I've heard of them ignoring |
| 43 |
> other issues like the "as-needed" one for years. |
| 44 |
|
| 45 |
Upstream seems a bit unfocused and probably needs some prodding to get |
| 46 |
going. The suggested change is simple and won't affect normal libtool use |
| 47 |
so it should not be to hard to get it committed. |
| 48 |
|
| 49 |
Jocke, off for the weekend as of now. |
Archives