| 1 |
On Sat, 1 Sep 2012 00:18:07 +0200 |
| 2 |
Fabio Erculiani <lxnay@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 11:58 PM, Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o> |
| 5 |
> wrote: |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > For optional dependencies, I'm pretty happy with the |
| 8 |
> > "runtime-switchable USE flags" proposal: |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > https://gist.github.com/2945569 |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> runtime-switchable USE flags for optional dependencies o.O? It sounds |
| 13 |
> like using a spoon to eat spaghetti to me. |
| 14 |
> I think SDEPEND is a much simpler approach to the issue, why |
| 15 |
> introducing a new kind of USE flags to address what really belongs to |
| 16 |
> *DEPEND? |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Because otherwise you can't use USE flags. The rationale is there. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
Best regards, |
| 23 |
Michał Górny |
Archives