Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Kristian Benoit <kbenoit@×××××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-embedded] Interactive command
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 16:54:39
Message-Id: 1121359894.5971.98.camel@localhost
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-embedded] Interactive command by Michael Cummings
1 On Thu, 2005-07-14 at 12:01 -0400, Michael Cummings wrote:
2 > Not sure of the mechanics on how
3 > this is done for the portage emerge process, but even stopping the
4 > emerge process for those packages that *must* have a preconfig done
5 > would help (are there any though? I can think of one maybe, but not
6 > really anything to demand new functionality in portage yet).
7
8 This problem is mostly present in the embedded world. As the packages
9 have to be fine tuned (as a kernel is) at compiled time for the system
10 on which it is beiing build. For example, uClibc and busybox uses a
11 kernel like config.
12
13 As described on busybox's home page:
14
15 "BusyBox combines tiny versions of many common UNIX utilities into a
16 single small executable. It provides replacements for most of the
17 utilities you usually find in GNU fileutils, shellutils, etc. The
18 utilities in BusyBox generally have fewer options than their
19 full-featured GNU cousins; however, the options that are included
20 provide the expected functionality and behave very much like their GNU
21 counterparts. BusyBox provides a fairly complete environment for any
22 small or embedded system."
23
24 With so many applications/options provided by a single package, that aim
25 to go in small memory/storage system, one must understand that users
26 must fine tune it.
27
28 Kristian
29
30 --
31 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list