| 1 |
On 01/13/2013 09:43 AM, hasufell wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 01/13/2013 03:24 PM, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Hello, |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>> Right now an attempt to commit an ebuild with no HOMEPAGE results |
| 6 |
>> in: |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
>> HOMEPAGE.missing 1 |
| 9 |
>> app-admin/eselect-sh/eselect-sh-0.4.ebuild |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
>> Note: use --include-dev (-d) to check dependencies for 'dev' |
| 12 |
>> profiles |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
>> Please fix these important QA issues first. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
>> Why is this considered an 'important QA issue'? Does the policy |
| 17 |
>> really say that if something doesn't have a homepage, we're |
| 18 |
>> supposed to put garbage in there? |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> That is already lifted: |
| 23 |
> https://dev.gentoo.org/~ulm/pms/head/pms.html#x1-660007.2 |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> seems to be a repoman bug or just not yet implemented |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
repoman is intended to enforce policies, which can be stricter than pms. |
| 28 |
So, the question is, what is our policy going to be? |
| 29 |
-- |
| 30 |
Thanks, |
| 31 |
Zac |
Archives