| 1 |
On 13 December 2021 17:24:18 UTC, Mart Raudsepp <leio@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
>Actually I kind of preferred a static name over straight mktemp, |
| 4 |
>because emktemp supported other cases than a pure mktemp usage does. |
| 5 |
>But I don't know if it could ever clash things in some weird |
| 6 |
>situations. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
That last part is the message I tried to convey in my e-mail, sorry if I wasn't clear enough. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Anyway, could anyone with more Postage/PMS experience weigh in on this? If it is indeed safe then the eclass could be modified further, e.g. to use static names with EAPI-8+ but stick with mktemp for older EAPIs just to be safe. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
-- |
| 13 |
Marecki |
Archives