1 |
maillog: 14/04/2005-14:10:34(-0600): Jason Wever types |
2 |
> On Thu, 14 Apr 2005, Chris Gianelloni wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
> > Reply-to-All is evil. You should be using Reply-to-List. I know that I |
5 |
> > sure don't need to get the same email both on and off-list. Off-list |
6 |
> > emails should be reserved only for when you explicitly do not want to |
7 |
> > send to the list and only to the original email's author. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> And just how many mail clients support reply-to-list (which in and of |
10 |
> itself doesn't have well defined standards and is not adhered to in any |
11 |
> specific way by the myriads of mailing list software packages out there)? |
12 |
> Not very many last I checked. |
13 |
|
14 |
"L" seems to work fine great in mutt. I do not have the word "gentoo" |
15 |
mentioned in my muttrc, but it properly got the address from the |
16 |
"List-Post" header. I also tried it on a "List-Post:<mailto:gentoo-dev@g.o>" |
17 |
posting (that was CCed to @lists) and it was properly addressed to |
18 |
gentoo-dev@g.o. |
19 |
|
20 |
Congratulations. There is at least one properly behaving mail client. |
21 |
|
22 |
It will be known how proper if it sets the Mail-FollowUp-To: header on |
23 |
this mail. |
24 |
|
25 |
> Best for now to deal with whether you want Reply-To to be altered or use |
26 |
> Reply-To all. |
27 |
|
28 |
I don't really care, but out of principle -- don't touch the header is |
29 |
my vote. |
30 |
|
31 |
-- |
32 |
\ Georgi Georgiev \ Apples have meant trouble since eden. -- \ |
33 |
/ chutz@×××.net / MaDsen Wikholm, mwikholm@×××××××.fi / |
34 |
\ +81(90)2877-8845 \ \ |