Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Lance Albertson <ramereth@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: GLEP 19: Gentoo Stable Portage Tree -- ideas
Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 17:29:34
Message-Id: 43C14B4B.7070603@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: GLEP 19: Gentoo Stable Portage Tree -- ideas by Brian Harring
1 Brian Harring wrote:
2 > On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 10:55:50AM -0600, Lance Albertson wrote:
3 >
4 >>A few rough ideas that just popped in my
5 >>head is either packing all of these versions into one tarball (not even
6 >>sure if thats feasible)
7
8 <snip>
9
10 >>, or creating a hashed suffix based upon the
11 >>useflags enabled/disabled at the time that you append to the tarball name.
12 >
13 > +1 on mangling the name. Need something for keywords anyways.
14 >
15 > Alternative is expanding the bintree format, cat/pkg-ver being a
16 > directory, with the binpkgs held with in...
17 >
18 > Either way, bintree/binpkg format are all rolled into one mess, as
19 > stated, open to proposals to make it less sucky.
20
21 Is there an alternative format outside of bzip2tarballs that might fit
22 this better? Ignoring backward compatibility, is there anything?
23
24 --
25 Lance Albertson <ramereth@g.o>
26 Gentoo Infrastructure | Operations Manager
27
28 ---
29 GPG Public Key: <http://www.ramereth.net/lance.asc>
30 Key fingerprint: 0423 92F3 544A 1282 5AB1 4D07 416F A15D 27F4 B742
31
32 ramereth/irc.freenode.net

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature