| 1 |
Mike Gilbert wrote: |
| 2 |
> The current (proxied) maintainer is somewhat difficult to work with |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Why is Arfrever being treated so bad here? To me, it looks like |
| 5 |
you're the one who is difficult to work with. :\ |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Jakov Smolić wrote: |
| 9 |
> From what I've investigated, other major distributions don't apply |
| 10 |
> any similar patches which means that we are likely to stop carrying |
| 11 |
> most (or even all) of the current patches. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
What kind of silly groupthink is this? I expect Gentoo to champion choice. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Mike Gilbert wrote: |
| 17 |
> There is an open QA bug [1] regarding the large set of undocumented |
| 18 |
> patches that are being applied in the stable ebuilds. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Arfrever is active in the bug you linked, has provided explanations |
| 21 |
for the patches and prepared to restructure the patches so that they |
| 22 |
can be gated by local USE flags, has made several different concrete |
| 23 |
suggestions for possible implementations and requested feedback, but |
| 24 |
has received no reply in the bug and instead there's now this |
| 25 |
backstabbing discussion on this list. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Really? |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
//Peter |
Archives