[gentoo-dev] Re: EAPI Changes

[Ryan Hill]

On Sun, 17 May 2009 23:00:21 +0200
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis <arfrever.fta@×××××.com> wrote:

> 2009-05-17 22:51:50 Ryan Hill napisał(a):
> > On Sun, 17 May 2009 21:03:46 +0200
> > Tiziano Müller <dev-zero@g.o> wrote:
> > > So, unless you're doing a pkgmove
> > > it's a dangerous thing since the PM can't reliably track reverse deps
> > > when doing uninstalls since it has to use the vdb entry for that,
> > > doesn't it?
> >
> > Since when do we track reverse deps for uninstalls?
>
> Portage supports `emerge --depclean ${package}` command which checks reverse dependencies.

But it also checks link level dependencies as well, doesn't it?


-- 
gcc-porting,                                      by design, by neglect
treecleaner,                              for a fact or just for effect
wxwidgets @ gentoo     EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662