1 |
On 3/5/11 12:51 AM, Tomáš Chvátal wrote: |
2 |
> Dne 5.3.2011 00:46, Alex Alexander napsal(a): |
3 |
>> Chromium has its own version of webkit :) |
4 |
> For this lovely thing it should be webkit-gtk |
5 |
|
6 |
Actually, Alex is right. Chromium has its own port of WebKit, different |
7 |
from Qt and GTK ports. Reasons for that include sandboxing, process |
8 |
separation, and little rendering differences (for example using the skia |
9 |
library). |
10 |
|
11 |
This might be possible to change in the future (a separate library to |
12 |
possibly avoid recompilations), but for now I'm not aware of any effort |
13 |
to do that (it's really non-trivial). |
14 |
|
15 |
On 3/5/11 3:41 AM, Rich Freeman wrote: |
16 |
> Still, the build has gotten faster with time as the excellent g.o |
17 |
> chromium team slowly strips out bundled libs. If you want a real |
18 |
> eye-opener do a du -s * in the source tree for chromium and see where |
19 |
> all the code is. |
20 |
|
21 |
Thanks! Anyway, I guess that the WebKit part of the browser still takes |
22 |
the majority of the compile time. |
23 |
|
24 |
On 3/5/11 12:58 AM, Alex Alexander wrote: |
25 |
> I can also give you a binpkg from one of my chroots :P |
26 |
|
27 |
It sounds like a possible option. We could then advertise those binpkgs |
28 |
on the project page, or make them semi-official. If you or someone else |
29 |
is interested in doing that, I second that effort. |
30 |
|
31 |
Paweł Hajdan, Jr. |