1 |
On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 1:36 PM Sam James <sam@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> |
4 |
> |
5 |
> > On 5 Oct 2021, at 21:29, Alec Warner <antarus@g.o> wrote: |
6 |
> > |
7 |
> > I thought we were going to go with the github-pages type route |
8 |
> > (markdown, rendered online or locally.) |
9 |
> > |
10 |
> |
11 |
> So, the thinking was, we could allow somewhat shorthand |
12 |
> notes or for the people who want to invest more time, allow |
13 |
> the GitHub-pages type route. |
14 |
> |
15 |
> But I'm open to the idea of just recommending people |
16 |
> use that if there's no appetite for mixed types. |
17 |
|
18 |
I'd argue we can add NOTES.md to packages (e.g. allow those files.) |
19 |
Then we modify packages.gentoo.org to render the markdown; or users |
20 |
can render locally or read unrendered. |
21 |
|
22 |
WDYT? |
23 |
|
24 |
-A |
25 |
|
26 |
> |
27 |
> > -A |
28 |
> > |
29 |
> > On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 11:28 AM Sam James <sam@g.o> wrote: |
30 |
> >> |
31 |
> >> This is a preliminary version/draft of a proposed change to |
32 |
> >> GLEP 68. |
33 |
> >> |
34 |
> >> I'd like to introduce a method for developers to signal anything |
35 |
> >> special about a package and how to correctly maintain it. |
36 |
> >> |
37 |
> >> Sam James (1): |
38 |
> >> glep-0068: Add notes element for package maintenance instructions |
39 |
> >> |
40 |
> >> glep-0068.rst | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++++--- |
41 |
> >> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) |
42 |
> >> |
43 |
> >> -- |
44 |
> >> 2.33.0 |
45 |
> >> |
46 |
> >> |
47 |
> > |
48 |
> |