From: | Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] timezone configuration - why copying, not symlinking /etc/localtime ? | ||
Date: | Sun, 21 Mar 2021 04:19:16 | ||
Message-Id: | uk0q16swj@gentoo.org | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] timezone configuration - why copying, not symlinking /etc/localtime ? by William Hubbs |
1 | >>>>> On Sat, 20 Mar 2021, William Hubbs wrote: |
2 | |
3 | > /etc/localtime should definitely be a symlink to the proper file in |
4 | > /usr/share/zoneinfo. |
5 | |
6 | > This works fine if /usr is on a separate partition *and* you are using |
7 | > an initramfs. The only time it doesn't work is if /usr is separate |
8 | > without using an initramfs. |
9 | |
10 | > Council decided years ago that we don't support separate /usr without |
11 | > an initramfs, but we haven't completed that transition yet. |
12 | |
13 | Which doesn't imply that we deliberately break things. |
14 | |
15 | Ulrich |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] timezone configuration - why copying, not symlinking /etc/localtime ? | Alec Warner <antarus@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] timezone configuration - why copying, not symlinking /etc/localtime ? | James Le Cuirot <chewi@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] timezone configuration - why copying, not symlinking /etc/localtime ? | "Andreas K. Huettel" <dilfridge@g.o> |