1 |
Gentoo Developers and Users, |
2 |
|
3 |
After having an "enlightening" chat with #kde several weeks ago regarding |
4 |
their (bloated) packaging scheme, it mas made clear that their stance is to |
5 |
continue with that method of packaging. While I can understand that their |
6 |
packaging scheme may benefit the intended target audience, it unfortunately |
7 |
leaves me feeling considerably less than satisfied. |
8 |
|
9 |
During the discussion it was mentioned that they consider it the |
10 |
responsibility of the individual Linux distribution to separate the software |
11 |
applications for distribution (the file hierarchy of the KDE packages |
12 |
simplifies that task) to the community, if it was appropriate for the |
13 |
distribution's design philosophy. |
14 |
|
15 |
If Gentoo is committed to offering users a large degree of customizability, |
16 |
wouldn't segregating the various KDE components lend itself to continuing the |
17 |
evolution of that flexibility? I would cheer at the ability to type "emerge |
18 |
kmail" rather than "emerge kdepim". |
19 |
|
20 |
I would like to request that any interested parties contribute their opinions |
21 |
on this subject. It would be interesting to see how Gentoo users feel about |
22 |
the current packaging scheme and what, if anything, could be improved. |
23 |
|
24 |
|
25 |
-- |
26 |
Anthony Gorecki |
27 |
Ectro-Linux Foundation |