| 1 |
On 03/08/2012 01:42 AM, Marc Schiffbauer wrote: |
| 2 |
> * Ulrich Mueller schrieb am 08.03.12 um 08:27 Uhr: |
| 3 |
>> Such constructs also cannot be used with any of the other proposed |
| 4 |
>> solutions. And in fact, nobody is using such things in practice. |
| 5 |
>> _All_ ebuilds in the Portage tree can be successfully parsed with the |
| 6 |
>> regexp proposed. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Ebuilds are bash scripts. I think introducing exceptions or |
| 9 |
> constraints here is not straightforward. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Given that ebuilds already have to conform to a vast number of |
| 12 |
constraints that ordinary bash scripts do not. I think that it's |
| 13 |
perfectly reasonable for ebuilds to have a constrained syntax for EAPI |
| 14 |
assignments. |
| 15 |
-- |
| 16 |
Thanks, |
| 17 |
Zac |
Archives