| 1 |
Piotr Jaroszy?ski wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> Hello, |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> looks like every nominee wants the council to be more technical so I |
| 6 |
> have a few technical questions for you: |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> 1. GLEP54 |
| 9 |
Doit! |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
> 2. GLEP55 |
| 12 |
Good idea. But the GLEP still contains too many "may"'s and "should"'s. |
| 13 |
Example: "[...] but note that one should never explicitly set both EAPIs to |
| 14 |
different values. [...]". Define it clearer: "It is not allowed to set both |
| 15 |
EAPIs.". |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
And why don't we change the versioning of the EAPI to a "X.Y" scheme and |
| 18 |
demand that changes in the minor version must not break sourcing of the |
| 19 |
ebuild with older package managers and that major versions do. |
| 20 |
Major version numbers are written in the postfix, while minor version |
| 21 |
numbers are written in the ebuild itself as EAPI_MINOR="1". So, the current |
| 22 |
EAPI 1 would then be in fact "0.1". |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Cheers, |
| 25 |
Tiziano |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives