| 1 |
On Wednesday 07 December 2005 17:03, Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
| 2 |
> Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
| 3 |
> | As far as progress on this issue, we're looking into adopting glep 37 |
| 4 |
> | and creating a virtual/x11 ebuild to address this. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> I've just committed virtual/x11 to the tree. See |
| 7 |
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112896 if you run into any |
| 8 |
> problems with it. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> It won't work properly with macos yet because they use a "fake" package, |
| 11 |
> so they'll have to hang on to virtual/x11 in the profiles. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
It should work if the listed package matches what the macos profiles have in |
| 14 |
package.provided... |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
> I plan to remove the virtual/x11 definition from base/virtuals in a |
| 17 |
> couple of days, because this should provide a full (and non-broken) |
| 18 |
> replacement. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
This can be easily tested in advance by adding the following: |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
# cat /etc/portage/profile/virtuals |
| 23 |
virtual/x11 -* |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
Jason Stubbs |
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives