| 1 |
Hi! |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
On Mon, 09 Nov 2009, Ben de Groot wrote: |
| 4 |
> We especially request ppc64 to be marked as an experimental arch, as it |
| 5 |
> is the worst one lagging in stabilization. See bug 281821 for a poignant |
| 6 |
> example, a 3 months open security bug. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
As a side note, don't hesitate to poke me or armin76 if you have |
| 9 |
the feeling that anything is lagging because alpha isn't quick |
| 10 |
enough. I try to handle security bugs (i.e. "CC: alpha and (CC: |
| 11 |
or requestor security@)") first, but in the case of Qt, there |
| 12 |
were two bugs, one normal stablereq with CC alpha and security |
| 13 |
bug without arch CCs. Thus, it just wasn't on my radar as needing |
| 14 |
quick action. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Regards, |
| 17 |
Tobias |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
PS: I assume the "just poke me gently if you think I'm slow" goes |
| 20 |
for other arches as far as armin76 is concerned, but I let him |
| 21 |
speak for himself. |
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
printk("Pretending it's a 3/80, but very afraid...\n"); |
| 24 |
linux-2.6.19/arch/m68k/sun3x/prom.c |
Archives